Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 forward

Chris asked:

Is a relational notion of the Self more feasible than a substance-grounded notion of the self?

If so, where does this leave a culture which has been grounded on a substance-orientated notion of
the self and how damaging is this to the viability of related concepts/beliefs which are built upon the
edifice of such a particular construct e.g. ideas of freedom and responsibility?

============

I think it is. I don't think that it leaves the substance-oriented culture worse off, because such an
understanding has been built relationally anyway. For it to change requires relationally based
concepts to change gradually under the insights of a relational view. Concepts such as autonomy,
freedom etc have to be rebuilt. Isn't that what is happening in our culture (western — I'm making an
assumption that you and I share it here) right now?

Tim Sprod