Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 forward

Michael asked:

I am currently writing an essay on Protagorean Relativism. I am to provide my opinion on the subject.
Take for example, one ill and one healthy man. They both drink the same orange juice, however it is
sweet to the healthy man and sour to the sick man. In Protagorean Relativity is the orange juice
unchanging or always changing according to who perceives it?

============

As far as Protagoreanrelativism goes, there's a nice little exposition of it at:
http://www.arts.ubc.ca/philos/russellj/100lec00.htm. And I'm sure there are many others. As I
understand it, it depends on what you mean by the "orange juice", whether that refers to the "actual"
juice lying "behind" (so to speak) one's sensory impressions, or the juice considered strictly as one
sees, tastes, etc., it. The latter, as the source of "truth", if I understand that position correctly, is the
Protagorean thesis. In that vein, you might also look at various writings by Bernard Williams, who is
very concerned with truth (I only cite one ref below).

Williams, B. (1985). Ethics and the limits of philosophyCambridge, Harvard University Press.

Steven Ravett Brown