Kristen asked:

I'm a student in the U.S. I am currently doing a paper on the difference between knowledge and true
belief. I've developed a bit of writer's block/ mass confusion. Could you give me your view on the
difference (if any) between the two? I'm taking the stance that a true belief is a form of knowledge,
that you need a belief in order to reach a place of knowledge. What are your thoughts on this? Just a
brief synopsis would be greatly appreciated.

============

Well I might just guess that Whirlaway would win a certain race and even bet a lot of money. So that if
someone asked me whether I believe Whirlaway would win I would sincerely reply, "Yes, I do." Well
now, let's suppose I am right and Whirlaway does win, so I win all that money. But now, let's suppose
that someone says to me, "How did you know that Whirlaway would win? The odds makers thought
she would not." I might reply, well, I didn't know at all. I just guessed and I turned out to be right. I
guess I was just lucky!" So, I had no reasons or justification for my belief, but nevertheless I was right,
my belief was true. So I did not know. But I had a true belief.

Knowledge needs adequate reasons in addition to being a true belief.

Ken Stern