Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 forward

Maximiliano asked:

I read many years a go a book about Maeister Eckhart, where he said: "Are you talking about God?
Anything you could said about him is a lie". Do you know, the name of the book?

============

Breakthrough by Matthew Fox I thought, but having said that I can't find on which page. This saying
reads like a gloss on 1 John 1:10; 2:21-22; 4:6, 20. It is also a statement of apophatic(negative)
theology in which the presupposition is that God is not defined by his being or non-being, but by what
he is not (His beyond-being). This can be read about in the Mystical Theology of Pseudo-Dionysius
(in print in English in the Classics of Western Spirituality series, NY: Paulist Press.) I wonder about
the translations of Eckhardt.. There are a lot, some of them are very loose, even I would say,
made-up. Sermon XXXII Homo quidam fecit coenam magnum (Lk.14:16) in the Pfeiffer collection,
with Spamer's insert from his Texte, has: We can say nothing of God because nothing is like him."
Actually Eckhardt reiterates this idea throughout his sermons, tractates and sayings. The idea that
anything said about God is a lie imputes moral fault. Unlike Eckhardt to be this loose-tongued with
language — more like an American translator who wants to underline what they believe to be
Eckhardt's anti-authoritarian disestablishment theology. There is also the logical difficulty which
Eckhardt would have seen had liar been his actual word: Eckhardt's statement is either true or false.
If it is false it would suggest that Eckhardt is a liar; if it is true it would mean Eckhardt is certainly a
liar.

Matthew Del Nevo

www.sicetnon.com