Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 forward

Ronald asked:

Assuming God is omniscient and omnipotent, what did he sacrifice by allowing his son to be
crucified?

============

God's having a son, etc., seems to be as much an assumption as is God's being omniscient and
omnipotent, but Ronald's question treats it as a fact. The assumption that God is omniscient and
omnipotent is purely conceptual and can be considered apart from theological interpretations of
alleged historical events. That is not the case for the assumption that God had a son and sacrificed
him. The philosopher, as such, has no special competence to ascertain historical events or assess
their theological significance.

Tony Flood

13