Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 forward

Brett asked:

Does the theory of natural law offer something to ethics which the divine command theory does not or
cannot?

============

If it could be demonstrated that there are natural moral laws such laws could rationally convince
everybody (everybody who is thinking rationally that is), not just followers of one particular belief. Also
any theory of divine command has to answer the following questions: Is something morally good
because God says so, or does God say so because it is morally good? In the first case this would
mean that God could theoretically decide any action to be morally good, so it becomes really a
question of power? In the second case the action is morally good whether God agrees or not. So
where does this moral goodness come from?

Helene Dumitriu

27