Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 forward

James asked:

I've read both that "good" is the final end and the end in itself but I've also read the same for
"happiness" as well. So my question is, which of these two is the deeper end?

============

Well, I may be going off the deep end here, but many philosophers including Plato, Aristotle, and
John Stuart Mill have identified good and happiness as being the same things or at least they have
said that the only finally good thing is happiness. So your question assumes good and happiness are
different and they may not be.

But some philosophers, for instance Immanuel Kant, have held that although happiness may be a
good thing, it is certainly not the unconditionally good thing (which Kant held was "the good will" or
the motive of duty). So Kant believed that the good was a "deeper end" than happiness.

Ken Stern

29