Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 forward

Kambo asked:

How would you place the following aspects in the context of the philosophy of education:

1. discipline

2. democracy

3. freedom

4. punishment

============

Here's one take on it: animal studies have shown that negative reinforcement, i.e., punishment, is a
fast way to stop animals from making only the exactbehavior they are punished for. It does not stop
that samebehavior under othercircumstances. In other words, the animal avoids being punished.
Period. The same studies have shown that positive reinforcement, while more difficult and longer to
make effective, generalizes to other settings and to related behaviors. In other words, animals try to
find ways to be reinforced: with food, petting, etc. I'll leave you to work out the implications for
disciplining children.

Here's another take on it. George Lakoff wrote a book called Moral Politics in which he talks about the
Strict Father metaphor which politically conservative people run their and others lives by. The Strict
Father sets rules which must be obeyed or a child will be punished. Liberals, on the other hand, live
according to the Supportive Parent model, in which the parent praises a child and attempts to help
them. Now what would you expect to happen, given the animal studies above?

Steven Ravett Brown

49