 |
According to Popper, the theorist is not obliged to treat every experiment which fails to turn out as
predicted as a 'refutation'. If the theory in question has made lots of successful predictions in the past,
then an alternative, less radical course of action is to put forward auxiliary hypotheses which explain
why the prediction failed in this particular instance. And that's where things get difficult. Because it is
left to the judgement of the researcher in each case of a putative 'refutation' whether to trash the
theory or try to save it.
|