Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 forward

Mohammad asked:

What is a 'refutation' in Popper's view?

============

One of Popper's books is called Conjectures and Refutations. A conjecture is a proposed theory of
how some scientific thing works. A refutation is an experiment that does not turn out the way it was
predicted to, on the basis of the conjecture. It falsifies the theory.

Tim Sprod

According to Popper, the theorist is notobliged to treat every experiment which fails to turn out as
predicted as a 'refutation'. If the theory in question has made lots of successful predictions in the past,
then an alternative, less radical course of action is to put forward auxiliary hypotheseswhich explain
why the prediction failed in this particular instance. And that's where things get difficult. Because it is
left to the judgement of the researcher in each case of a putative 'refutation' whether to trash the
theory or try to save it.

Geoffrey Klempner

61