Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 forward

Stephanie asked:

I'm doing my dissertation on a comparison between art (particularly that of MC Escher) and
philosophy. However, I am struggling to find valuable resources. Do you know of any texts which you
feel would be important in this subject?

============

Escher is one of the most popular choices of artist for the covers of philosophy books, but his
appearances between them are much less frequent. The principal exception is a book you must have
already seen: Douglas R. Hofstadter 1979 Godel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid(New York:
Basic Books/ London: Harvester). This is a vast and extraordinary book, and there's a lot of stuff in it
which is outside the scope of your dissertation, but it is well worth a careful browse.

You might also want to take a look at: Patrick Hughes and George Brecht 1975 Vicious Circles and
Infinity: An Anthology of Paradoxes
(New York: Doubleday/ London: Jonathan Cape). There are more
philosophically rewarding treatments of the paradoxes of self-reference, but this one was compiled by
two artists, and should prove worth the effort it may take you to track it down (it's out of print). It
contains a lot of carefully chosen material that can be hard to find elsewhere, including a discussion
of visual and artistic paradox.

Michel Foucault's essay on Magritte, Michel Foucault 1983 This is not a pipe, translated by James
Harkness (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press). could be a helpful point of comparison, but
you would really have to read a lot more Foucault to appreciate it fully.

Finally, I did a search on Philosopher's Index for 'Escher'. The most plausible looking item retrieved
was: Jane Duran 1993 'Escher and Parmigianino: A Study in Paradox' British Journal of Aesthetics
33(3): 239-245.

Andrew Aberdein

85