Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 forward

Karen asked:

I am writing a research paper on whether or not Buddhism should be considered a religion or
philosophy of a lifestyle, I was wondering what you thought it was?

===========

Is Dogen's Ts'ao-tung Zen a religion? Is Nagarjuna's Madhyamika school a religion? Is Tibetan
Buddhism a philosophy of life style?

Again the division of Buddhism in several traditions, schools, and sects means that there could not be
a single point of view. Personally I think that Gautama Siddharta's original teaching should be
considered a philosophy (a philosophy of life style, if you prefer) and that Buddhism in general could
be considered both a religion and a philosophy.

However, be careful in your research. There are voices who claim that philosophy and religion are
only Western categories. That the Orient (when and where is not influenced by Western culture)
speaks still in terms of "tradition". Have a look, all the same, at Ananda K. Coomaraswamy's
Hindouism and Bouddhism.

Jean Nakos