Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 forward

Aravis asked:

What would Descartes's opinion on cloning be?

===========

Difficult question because obviously one can only speculate. I think actually that it would not present
an explanatory problem for him (or mind-body dualism) at all. Descartes thought the body is only a
kind of machine, so probably for him cloning would not be really different from, say, identical twins.
The important thing would be to him that clones have different minds (souls). Maybe since Descartes
was religious he might take issue with man creating life in a different way than God had intended.
However he probably would reassure himself/us by saying that a) nothing is possible except God lets
it happen, b) if God gives a soul to this being, this is in fact the important step in creation, the one
step man cannot imitate.

Helene Dumitriu