Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 forward

Eugene asked:

Is Eric Voegelin, who was severely critical of modern philosophy, especially what he called its
"deformation" From Descartes to Hegel, considered or recognized as a philosopher by modern
philosophers?

===========

Since I am not a landlord I am quite liberal with the application of the the term philosopher. For the
most part, so far as I am concerned, anyone who calls himself (herself) a philosopher is one. Of
course, whether think someone who calls himself a philosopher is a good philosopher is a different
issue. It is a little analogous to a person who is moving on a dance floor and says he is dancing. I am
willing to allow that person is dancing, whatever he does, but whether he is a good dancer is quite a
different matter.

You may really be asking whether Eric Voegelin is well-known to other philosophers. I think the
answer to that is, no.

Ken Stern