Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 forward

Prathamesh asked:

In the current changing scenario,what should be our approach to, and philosophy of education?

============

Masaryk, one time president of inter-war Chekoslovakia, once argued that the ills of the age could
largely be attributed to the prevalence of what he called "semi-education" amongst those in positions
of influence in public life (from the lowliest teachers to political leaders).

By "semi-education" he meant the the sort of education that furnished people with a facile ability to
criticise the foundations of everything without providing any deeper ability or understanding with
which to defend the foundations of anything.

Would you not agree that some commitment to redressing this imbalance should be expected of a
philosophy of education in the current climate, in the "current changing scenario", as you put it?

Robert de Villiers