Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 forward

Faris asked:

Is a democracy based on reason possible? For Socrates, it seems that a single person will always
know what is best, and yet his idea of reason seems to extend beyond knowledge to encompass the
freedom of questioning. How might this allow for the justification of democracy?

============

I don't know about reason... human beings are neither sane nor rational. But there's a bit of hope;
take a look at this study. Here's a quote:

"
"When red deer stand up and honeybees dance, they are not simply stretching their legs or indicating
where the nectar is, according to a new study. As bizarre as it may seem, they are voting on whether
to move to greener pastures or richer flowers.

"The process is unconscious, the researchers say. No deer counts votes or checks ballots; bees do
not know the difference between a dimple and a chad. But no one deer or bee or buffalo decides
when the group moves. If democracy means that actions are taken based not on a ruler's preference,
but the preferences of a majority, then animals have democracy.""

Full text at: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/14/science/life/14DEMO.html

So, fortunately, it seems that rationality is not necessary for democracy (but perhaps sanity is... in that
case, we have problems), and that democracy actually isa good choice for governing.

Steven Ravett Brown