Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 forward

Fawn asked:

I am a very new student to philosophy and I find that the subject is so very broad in all the factors we
must consider. A fellow student pointed out that he thought there was no point to philosophy at all. He
declared that it was a waste of the time we know we do have. My instructor, said that there was an
article called "The Uselessness of Philosophy" but could not remember the author or where he had
found the article. He told me that it would be a good source to look into as I am developing my
semester paper on why philosophy is not a waste of time. He said that it would help me prepare my
paper for all the counter arguments. I have searched avidly to no avail. I was hoping that someone
within your group might point me to a source similar or the actual article.

============

"The unexpected uselesness of philosophy" was originally a chapter in a book of Nobel prize winning
physician Steven Weinberg. I don't have it, but it became a real classic in some circles. Weinberg is
usually quite negative about philosophy.

Steven Sailer commented on it at: http://www.isteve.com/Philosophy.htm

Henk Tuten

I think a good source for you would be the final chapter of Bertrand Russell's little book, The
Problems of Philosophy
which is titled, "The Value of Philosophy".

Let me just add that whether philosophy is useless or not is, itself, a philosophical question. So how
useless could a study be when to decide whether it is useless you are obliged to engage in that study
itself?

Ken Stern

Try this site:

http://www.arts.ualberta.ca/~whyphil/

I'm not going to go into why Ido philosophy... except that I am simply interested, and have been since
I was very young, in questions usually considered "philosophical".

Steven Ravett Brown