Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 forward

Lauren asked:

I was trying t figure out how to put this into a standard form syllogism. Would you be able to help?

"Liberty means responsibility. That is why most men dread it."

============

This syllogism is of form AOO-3 and is valid. It is also an enthymeme (or incomplete syllogism) with a
missing minor premise which needs to be supplied. One way of formulating it might be:

(1) All lovers of liberty are lovers of responsibility

(2) Some people are not lovers of responsibility (This is the supplied premise)

(3) Therefore: Some people are not lovers of liberty.

Ken Stern

'Most' is tricky. You can for certain purposes equate 'most' with 'some', but something is lost in the
translation. This can be seen in the following putative inference:

(a) Most philosophers know about logic.

(b) Most philosophers who know about logic, know the meaning of 'incomplete syllogism'.

(c) Therefore most philosophers know the meaning of 'incomplete syllogism'.

This is invalid. Suppose there are ten philosophers in the universe and that seven of them know
about logic. Out of the seven, four know the meaning of 'incomplete syllogism'. Then premisses (a)
and (b) are true but the conclusion (c) is false. This is a a counterexample to the argument I have just
given. If you can find a counterexample to an argument, then it is invalid.

Geoffrey Klempner