Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 forward

Rachel asked:

What if we only had three fingers, how would this have changed our five fingered world?

Take a look at a book on numbers, and the notion of "bases" for numbering systems. We use a base
10 numbering system, because... yes, we have 10 fingers total. If we had three fingers (two plus
thumb, right?), we'd probably use base 6, actually a better system (base 12 is really the best,
because 12 has so many divisors). So the numbers would go: 0,1,2,3,4,5, 10.Why? Because "10"
means: "take the next power of the base". That is, in base 10, 1 is 10 to the 0. 10 is 10 to the 1. 100 is
10 squared. And so forth. So in base 6, what is 10? Yes, we write it (in base 10) as "6". 100 is six
squared, i.e., 36, as we write it. And so on. The base used in computers is base 2. So the numbers
for computers are: 0,1,10,11,100... and so forth. Think about it.

Aside from that... we would have less sure grips on tools, I guess... but I don't see any reason for big
changes. Playing piano would be much harder... we would have to redesign them.

Steven Ravett Brown