|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Mary asked:
|
 |
What are the similarities and differences in Descartes and Spinoza's proofs for the existence of god,
and what purpose does god serve in each's system? From a confused thinker
|
 |
============
|
 |
1. (a) Since both were Rationalists, they both used a version of the Ontological Argument for for the
existence of God.
|
 |
(b) But what they proved were very different since they had very different concepts of God. Descartes'
concept of God was that of a transcendent being who was different from his creation, the world. But
Spinoza's concept of God was of an immanent being, who was identical with his creation, the world.
|
 |
2. In Descartes' system, God's role is to guarantee that our clear and distinct ideas are true. More
generally, that people can know (for certain) what is true.
|
 |
In Spinoza's system, God, who is everything, is the explanation of the world, namely God himself.
|
 |
Ken Stern
|
|