|
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Michael asked:
|
 |
I am an undergraduate philosophy student, and I very much desire to earn my PhD and become a
professor. I am concerned that my moral convictions may get in the way, however. I don't believe
that, for the most part, intellectual property enforcement is morally acceptable, and it would be a
violation of my personal code of ethics to grant anyone one an exclusive right to any papers I
produce. My question is, are there universities and reputable journals that don't demand exclusivity?
Even if the way is not easy, can I advance in academia without compromising my principles?
|
 |
============
|
 |
I am quite sympathetic to your views.
|
 |
There is a huge movement for open access to journals, articles, and other material. Stevan Harnad is
one of the prime people in this. Look here: http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/; you will find all sorts
of open access resources.
|
 |
Now. That's one way of getting papers out, and I use it myself. But it's not a good way to get
published. For that you need to be in reputable, peer-reviewed journals, and they are exclusive. So
what I do is put a preliminary version out on the free site and the final version in the journal. That way,
no one can complain... I hope. Technically, we have not submitted the same article to the journal and
the site. In addition, ethically, the site is not a journal, not peer-reviewed, and indeed asks for the
journals the article was published in. So you have not abused the peer-review process in putting your
article in Harnad's site. But you do need to publish in "normal" zines to get recognition.
|
 |
Steven Ravett Brown
|
|