Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 forward

Michael asked:

I am an undergraduate philosophy student, and I very much desire to earn my PhD and become a
professor. I am concerned that my moral convictions may get in the way, however. I don't believe
that, for the most part, intellectual property enforcement is morally acceptable, and it would be a
violation of my personal code of ethics to grant anyone one an exclusive right to any papers I
produce. My question is, are there universities and reputable journals that don't demand exclusivity?
Even if the way is not easy, can I advance in academia without compromising my principles?

============

I am quite sympathetic to your views.

There is a huge movement for open access to journals, articles, and other material. Stevan Harnad is
one of the prime people in this. Look here:
http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/; you will find all sorts
of open access resources.

Now. That's one way of getting papers out, and I use it myself. But it's nota good way to get
published. For that you need to be in reputable, peer-reviewed journals, and they areexclusive. So
what I do is put a preliminary version out on the free site and the final version in the journal. That way,
no one can complain... I hope. Technically, we have not submitted the same article to the journal and
the site. In addition, ethically, the site is nota journal, notpeer-reviewed, and indeed asks for the
journals the article waspublished in. So you have not abused the peer-review process in putting your
article in Harnad's site. But you do need to publish in "normal" zines to get recognition.

Steven Ravett Brown