Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 forward

Fabino asked:

"Our technologies establish the truth of many of our scientific laws." is there any comparable means
of establishing moral rules and norms?

============

Well, you're asking thequestion here... can we "naturalize" ethics? Indeed. Well, there's no generally
agreed-on answer to this question at this point. I favor the affirmative... but there are many positions
on this.

For pro-naturalizing, you might look at:

Clark, A. "Connectionism, Moral Cognition, and Collaborative Problem Solving." edited by L. May, M.
Friedman and A. Clark, 109-28. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1998.

Edgerton, R. B. Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony.1st ed. New York: The
Free Press, 1992.

Harrison, L.E., and S.P. Huntington, eds. Culture Matters: How Values Shape Human Progress.New
York, NY: Basic Books, 2000.

Johnson, M. "Imagination in Moral Judgment." Philosophy and Phenomenological Research46, no.
2 (1985): 265-80.

Johnson, M. Moral Imagination: Implications of Cognitive Science for Ethics.1st ed. Chicago: The
University of Chicago Press, 1993.

May, L., M. Friedman, and A. Eds. Clark. Mind and Morals: Essays on Cognitive Science and Ethics.
2nd ed. Boston: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1998.

For anti-naturalizing:

Annis, D. B. "A Contextualist Theory of Epistemic Justification." American Philosophical Quarterly15,
no. 3 (1978): 213-19.

Henderson, D. K. "Epistemic Competence and Contextualist Epistemology: Why Contextualism Is
Not Just the Poor Person's Coherentism." The Journal of Philosophy91, no. 12 (1994): 627-49.

MacIntyre, A. After Virtue.2nd ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press, 1984.

MacIntyre, A. Whose Justice? Which Rationality?1st ed. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame
Press, 1988.

Rawls, J. A Theory of Justice.21st ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1995.

For general reading:

Williams, B. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy.Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1985.

Anscombe, G. E. M. "Modern Moral Philosophy." Philosophy33, no. 124 (1958): 1-28.

Apostle, H. G. Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics.2nd ed. Grinnell, IA: The Peripatetic Press, 1984.

Hare, R. M. "Foundationalism and Coherentism in Ethics." edited by W. Sinnott-Armstrong and M.
Timmons, 190-99. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Kant, I. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals.Translated by L.W.T. Beck. New York, NY:
Bobbs-Merrill, 1959.

Sinnott-Armstrong, W., and M. Timmons.Moral Knowledge? New Readings in Moral Epistemology.
1st ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Sommers, C., and F. Sommers. Vice & Virtue in Everyday Life; Introductory Readings in Ethics.4th
ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1985.

Urmson, J. O. Aristotle's Ethics.11th ed. Malden: Blackwell Publishers Inc., 1998.

This is just a kind of very limited basic set of readings on this issue. To really know it well, you need
several years of reading.

Steven Ravett Brown