Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 forward

Trent asked:

In the Cartesian Meditationsby Husserl, is he using his concepts of pre-predicative judgement and
evidence as those modes of perception that influence on a sort of unconscious level? Possibly those
elements that influence from the sub-conscious that we are unaware of?

============

No, I don't believe so. I think that perhaps the best notion of "predicative" might be found on p. 50 (of
the paperback translation, i.e., towards the end of pp 21 in the Second Meditation), where Husserl
speaks of "particularization". To predicate is to make explicit in a sense similar to "objectify" or
"particularize", where a sensation or act which is predicated is one which has been clearly
differentiated and categorized, differentiated from other sensations. That is, able to be made into a
predicate in a formal sense. You see? And so a pre-predicative judgment or perception is not so
much unconscious, as it is not fully differentiated, more vague, less objectified or isolated from other
judgments. Remember that Husserl's ultimate aim, as a former mathematician, was to place
philosophy on a footing similar to that of mathematics.

Steven Ravett Brown