Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 forward

Alana asked:

Are you the real you or are you an image of you?

============

How about this one: suppose that you could take someone (while they're alive and conscious), strap
them into a machine which could scan their brain as completely as you want (down to the electrons or
whatever), and project an image of that scan, real-time, three-dimensionally, into the air in, say,
another room. Ok? Now... is that image conscious? Why or why not? Well, the classical answer is
that it can't be (aside from the science of scanning,etc.) because there's no internalcausation
involved in any of its processes. You see? The imageof one neuron doesn't cause the imageof
another neuron to fire, or whatever. But then one must ask... so what? If the processesare the same,
even as images, why isn't the image conscious? What iscausation, that it should "cause"
consciousness? Haha, nice one, right? I don't know the answer to this one... I'm just throwing it out to
you to chew on for a while. So in answer to your question... maybe it doesn't matter, really...? Or...?

Steven Ravett Brown