Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 forward

D-ster asked:

Can good exist without evil? or is evil a necessary condition to distinguish good from evil?

============

So tell me, what is "good"? Is it feelinggood? If so, then clearly you can feel good without, say,
feeling bad (or indeed without everfeeling bad; surely, for example, sugar tastes sweet, and you
enjoy that, whether you can taste anything else). Is it performing a good deed, like, say, saving
someone from drowning, or giving someone money? Well, again, you can do this without knowing
about "evil", or doing something evil, right? Is it something like generally and abstractly deciding to
help others? If so I still don't see why there needs to be evil to somehow make us aware that we're
doing something desirable, something that should be done. Is it knowingthat we're doing "good"?
Well... you might be able to argue this one, but I think you'd have to push it. Surely we are aware of
having choices, always, and that there are better and worse ones, in a variety of ways. And the better
ones, in, for example, modes of helping others will simply be "good", in my opinion.

Steven Ravett Brown