Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 forward

Kristyn asked:

I apologize for lack of professionalism of this, however I am stumped. I am trying to use philosophy to
look at the art of ceramics. I know there are philosophers and teachers who see ceramics as very
aesthetic, but I do not know where to start! Can I question it as a spiritual experience, or attachment
to the piece? I am a ceramics major, but it is easier to do what I do and feel what I feel, than it is for
me to explain it.

============

Well, there is a hugeamount written on aesthetics in philosophy; it's a field in itself. But if you want
something a bit different, try these:

Herrigel, E. 1971. Zen in the art of archery.Translated by R. F. C. Hull. New York, NY: Vintage
Books. Original edition, 1953.

Okakura, K. 1964. The book of tea.New York, NY: Dover Publications, Inc. Ross, N.W., ed. 1960.

The way of Zen: an East-West anthology. New York: Random House. 1977.

Tanizaki, J. In praise of shadows.Translated by T. J. Harper. New Haven, CT: Leete's Island Books,
Inc.

Steven Ravett Brown

125