Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 forward

Joe asked:

When ethical relativists preach tolerance aren't they suggesting that tolerance is the only ethical truth,
therefore contradicting their own edict that there are indeed no universal ethical truths?

============

Yes, well... you're not the first to point this out, believe me. But a real dyed-in-the-wool relativist will
simply say that they never claimed to be consistent; that in fact if they did, they couldn't be relativists.
And we're off again. No, this one is in my opinion a very good point but one which does not weigh
with the relativists, who are mostly, in my rather biased opinion, more concerned with adhering to
contemporary notions of "political correctness" or some such than with doing clear and consistent
philosophy.

Steven Ravett Brown

133