Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Philosophical Connections

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 forward

Frank asked:

To what extent can it be maintained that a literal interpretation of Christian scripture removes all
danger of human error?

============

Ill give you a counter question to ponder. To what extent can it be maintained that a literal
interpretation of Aristotle removes all danger of human error? If your answer is negative, then you
have the answer to your question as well. Not forgetting that there's a lot more brain power in Aristotle
than the Scriptures. In short: your question relates simply to what you, as a human being capable of
thinking, make of the scripture texts. You have no assurance than another persons word (who in turn
relies on yet another persons word and so on through the millennia) that anything whatever in the
scriptures has a source outside a human mind. That's a lot less than science or philosophy would
impose as the minimumstandard of critical thinking.

Jürgen Lawrenz

20