Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 forward

Jose asked:

Do we really have a "right to have children"? Or is it the other way round, i. e., Do children have a
right to have parents? If so, do they have a right to both a mother and a father? These questions have
been nagging me ever since the "same-sex couples adopting kids or resorting to insemination"
controversy started. Sorry to ask so many questions, but I think they are closely related.

============

What is a right? Perhaps it is an entitlement conferred by society and if this is so there is no right to
have children in England, although I believe IVF is going to become available on the National Health,
but you can only have one go and as far I know one go doesn't normally work so that can't be
conferring a right. If you were entitled to have a child you should be able to go with IVF as long as you
wish. If heterosexual couples don't have a right to have a child then same sex couples wouldn't either.

Just because there is no "right" in the sense of entitlement, this doesn't mean it is wrong.

We don't have a right to have parents. We just do. Whatever our parents are like, we just have to put
up with it.

Rachel Browne

32