Philo
Sophos
·com

philosophy is for everyone
and not just philosophers

philosophers should know lots
of things besides philosophy


PhiloSophos knowledge base

Pathways to Philosophy programs

Pathways web sites

Philosophy lovers gallery

Science, arts and humanities

PhiloSophos home

home first back 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 forward

Doug asked:

I propose that "The ultimate value is to preserve and enrich the capacity to value." This allows a
criticism of values which are inimical to human life (since life is a condition necessary to the capacity
to value), and also demands that I respect the capacity of others to pursue all those values they may
articulate for themselves which do not contradict this single ultimate value.

I expect this isn't a new idea (though I haven't encountered it in my reading), and would like to know
where I might find it expressed, and what arguments have been offered against it.

============

I'll be so egoistical as to suggest you read my Pathways paper Death, Free Will, Value.

Jürgen Lawrenz

74