 |
In the Apology, Socrates is defiant as anyone would be, who was convinced of their innocence. In his
own eyes, he has done nothing wrong. If, according to the laws of Athens, he has committed any
crime, then the laws are wrong — or at least, as you say, badly formulated. In fact, the charges raised
against him by his accusers are lies. In pursuing his vocation as a philosopher, he has created
enemies, who have sought to destroy him by bringing this false charge. Finally, after the Guilty verdict
has been pronounced, Socrates turns on his accusers, asserting that they, and the Athenian Court, in
convicting him, have committed a great wrong.
|
 |
In the Crito Socrates, in prison awaiting his execution, is offered the chance to escape, but turns it
down, arguing that such an action would 'harm the Laws of Athens'. Why should he care? The verdict
of the court was unjust, he does not deserve to die. His answer is very simple. The fact that a wrong
has been done to him does not make the action of escaping justice right. This is readily
understandable, in the light of the principle which Socrates lived by: 'It is worse to do wrong than to
suffer it.'
|